A terrible male (me) pays half his income for illness insurance. A abounding male pays the tiny fraction. Rush Limbaugh is so abounding he only pays out of pocket. How will usual people tarry when premiums get up to $5,000 the month?
This entry was posted in Man Health and tagged Care, Cost, Health, income, proportional, Shouldn't. Bookmark the permalink.
Health care should be privatized and not a role of the government. The more competition you have in a free market, the sooner prices go down and health care in itself becomes more affordable for everybody.
No…
No, it should be based on the amount of money you place in it. Let the consumer choose how much and what he/she wants covered health-wise.
I suppose some sort of sliding scare would be better than having some people just pay absolutely nothing at all. I mean look at Medicaid, those people pay nothing, why can they not pay like $20 or something, it would add up and be helpful with the costs.
uh yeah dude like when you get sick n stuff it should be so, like um the rich get sicker and stuff like its way cool. pass the J bro!
No. Because what happens when you get cancer or something and run up a bill you can’t afford to pay? The cost then gets shoved onto other people.
Maybe if our politicians did something about the monopoly drug companies and insurance companies have over health care services, there wouldn’t be so many people who can’t afford it.
You know? I can go into Mexico, get the same thing my HMO pays $150 for, for $15 without a prescription. That’s sad.
It’s not because rich people are screwing you so please shut up about the “Rush Limbaugh” talking points. It’s because people like Obama, Bush and other politicians have essentially handed the companies who control health care a monopoly by doing things such as forcing you to have health insurance. That’s a slam dunk for the people who own those companies.
Buy a cheaper plot dingus. Oh that’s right your precious Obama care ruined healthcare for all of us.
Shouldn’t the cost of everything be like that?
No.
In a honest world, the world of a child, everyone gets an award, everyone gets a prize, everyone gets equal shares no matter how much they earned it (or didn’t).
In a JUST world, people get what they earn, what they choose to work for, and sometimes things go incorrect.
But in your world WE have to pay for YOU.
That’s unjust. Socialism is OVER.
Go away.
Brilliant question, brilliant concern.
the answer is: yes
Yes. I believe it should be. I am very thankful to live in a country with universal health care.
You sound like a right intellectual. Shame we don’t have any in congress right now?
Maybe you could run for office and bring that up for a vote. Pay according to ability? Has a nice ring to it?
And to the other posts flawed logic about Medicare people paying nothing, that is blatantly incorrect. Even those on Medicare pay a part of their benefits for their healthcare, and let us not forget the ignorant “doughnut hole” brought to us by ol Dub?
No.
“POLITICAL CORRECTNESS is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the CLEAN END.” — Former US Senator from Wyoming, Alan K. Simpson
Republican since before she was born… and PROUD of it.
Of courser republicans don’t want that, there for the rich and despise the poor
Yes. Single-payer. Like every other industrialized nation…all of whom have better health outcomes than the U.S.